|

8/7/2008
誠邀提供服務
-
社會工作者註冊局正計劃進行一項名為「註冊社工在持續專業發展方面的態度及行為」的研究,現誠邀研究員遞交提供服務計劃書。欲知詳情,請按此處
。
-
社會工作者註冊局正計劃進行一項名為「僱用機構在持續專業發展方面的政策及措施」,現誠邀研究員遞交提供服務計劃書。欲知詳情,請按此處
。
1/7/2008
網上論壇關閉
註冊局在一九九九年於網頁中加設「論壇」,旨在為註冊社工提供討論平台,促進專業交流及溝通。惟於過去多年,效果未見理想。因此,註冊局決定於二零零八年七月一日,關閉該「論壇」。
如同工就註冊局的職能或日常運作有任何意見或查詢,請透過電郵、郵寄或傳真等,或網頁中的「投訴/投遞意見表格」,向註冊局提出。
8/4/2008
註冊社會工作者自願性專業責任保險計劃
美亞保險有限公司已把註冊社會工作者自願性專業責任保險計劃伸延至二零零九年三月三十一日,有需要的同工可自行填妥申請表格並交回美亞保險有限公司。如閣下希望獲取進一步的資料,歡迎聯絡劉愛珍小姐(2864
5514)/趙美寶小姐(2864
5348)(怡和保險)
申請表格
保險計劃詳細條款
10/12/2007
工作報告及核數報告
工作報告:
http://www.swrb.org.hk/documents/work2007_chi.doc
核數報告:
http://www.swrb.org.hk/documents/accounts2007.pdf
30/6/2007
澄清啟示
明報於二零零七年六月二十九日於其Jump -
EduPRO版刊載以「修讀副學士成註冊社工」為題的一篇特稿所介紹的「相關課程」一表中,包括了嶺南大學社區學院開辦的社會科學(應用青少年學)副學士課程的資料。註冊局謹此澄清,根據註冊局認可用以註冊的社會工作學歷名單,現時由嶺南大學,包括其社區學院,所頒授的學歷中,只有於二零零五年入學而獲嶺南大學社區學院頒授的社會科學副學士(社會工作)(為註冊局認可用以註冊為註冊社工的社工學歷,而該大學及其社區學院所頒授的其他學歷一概不能作為申請註冊為註冊社工的基本資格。
至目前為止,註冊紀錄冊載有註冊社工約一萬三千多人。此外,僱用機構則約有四百多間。
18/1/2007
註冊社會工作者工作守則教材套
註冊社會工作者工作守則教材套已製作完成,歡迎同工觀看及下載。
13/10/2006
修訂收費通告
社會工作者註冊局根據《社會工作者註冊條例》(第505章)第38(3)條,經諮詢壎芮盓Q及食物局後,現公布新修訂的收費如下:
申請註冊 收費 六百元正
續期註冊 收費 四百元正(不變)
重新申請註冊 收費 六百元正
如有查詢,請電2591 1955。
23/6/2006
Study on the Current State of Supervision for Social
Workers in Hong Kong
研究報告如下,供各位參閱:
請按此劉覽
研究報告
4/10/2004
繳費靈(即時款款)
為更方便同工申請續期,註冊局現進一步提供「繳費靈」與網上續期申請表相結合的新繳費模式,讓同工能於註冊局的網頁內,選擇以一站式遞交續期申請及繳付有關費用。該新設的續期申請及繳費模式現已開始運作,欲知詳情及使用方法,請按此處。 11/2/2004
網上續期
由即日起,同工可 透過登入www.swrb.org.hk/chi/renew.htm,直接從網上辦理續期申請,並經繳費靈網站或電話系統繳付有關費用。
26/09/2002
在本年三月間,註冊局進行意見調查,蒐集同工對註冊局提出的《社會工作者註冊條例》修訂建議的意見及取向。調查結果數據經整理後,現詳列如下,供同工參考:
請按此下載調查結果
24/8/01
Statement
of the Advisory Committee
On
Social Work Training and Manpower Planning
On Continuing Professional Development of Social Workers
The
Advisory Committee on Social Work Training and Manpower
Planning, an advisory body on the education and training
of social workers, notes that in the newly released
Guidelines on Code of Practice for Registered Social
Workers, the Social Workers Registration Board (SWRB)
recommends social workers to attend professional enhancement
activities of not less than 24 hours a year aiming at
upgrading their professional skills and knowledge. The
committee believes that the social work profession is
a progressive profession that strives for improvement
and excellence. Like other professions that share the
mission of enhancing the well-being of the community,
the social work profession, in view of the rapid changes
in Hong Kong, should be aware of the need to refresh
and consolidate the existing knowledge and practice
through training and should also constantly upgrade
and advance itself to better serve the community and
facilitate positive social development. Social workers,
being professionally trained, should always keep themselves
abreast of the changes impacting on the community and
the profession, and explore new approaches in discharging
their competence to meeting the new and changing demands
on, and the rising expectation of the profession.
As
stipulated in the Reform Proposals for the Education
System in Hong Kong issued by the Education Commission
in September 2000, Hong Kong needs to develop into a
society that values lifelong learning. Everyone should
have the attitude and ability for lifelong learning
and a willingness to advance further beyond the existing
knowledge level, and to continuously consolidate and
upgrade their knowledge and ability. Continuing education
is therefore crucial for the social work profession
in facing the challenges ahead.
The
Committee considers that now is the opportune time to
promote continuing professional development among social
workers, and strongly supports the recommendation of
the SWRB that social workers should attend professional
enhancement activities of not less than 24 hours a year.
11/08/2000
處理投訴
/ 意見的政策及程序
為加強與註冊同工的溝通,註冊局已制定了一套程序予同工就註冊局的整體政策、措施及運作向註冊局表達申訴或意見,請按此處下載有關程序詳情,而附件中的表格皆可從本網頁「表格」一欄下載。
11/04/2000
Web
Resources on Social Work Programs
Please
be informed that WWW Resources for Social Workers is
providing a list of social work programs available round
the world. You may visit website www.nyu.edu/socialwork/wwwrsw
for details.
03/04/2000
|
Extracted
Replay to RSW's Enquiries
The
Board has recently received enquiries from RSWs seeking
clarification on the interpretation of section 35
of the Social Workers
Registration Ordinance and the interpretation of the
Judgement handed
down by Mr. Justice Stone on the judicial review sought
by en ex-social
worker. After seeking legal advice, the Board has
issued a reply which
is extracted hereunder for general information:-
Interpretation
of the Ordinance
-
Under section 35 of the Ordinance,
"Any person who-
...
(h)
not being a registered social worker...knowingly
permits the
use of, or uses, in connection with his business
or profession.
(i) the description "registered social worker"
or "註冊社會工作者"
(ii) the initials "R.S.W."
(iii) the description "social work"
or "社會工作" or
"social worker"
or 社會工作者
or "社工";
or
(iv) any initials or abbreviation of words intended
to cause, or which
may reasonably cause, any person to believe that
the person using
the initials or abbreviations, as the case may
be, is on the Register,
(i)
not being on the Register, advertises or represents
himself as a registered
social worker or knowingly permits himself to
be so advertised or represented;
...
commits an offence and is liable on conviction
to a fine at level 5..."
-
According to the afore-quoted section of the Ordinance,
a person who is not
registered under the Ordinance but
describes himself as a
"registered social worker", or "social
worker", or uses the description of
"social work", or permits the use of these
terms with his rank title, is liable
to be prosecuted.
-
A non registered person practicing social work or
occupying the post of a social
worker would have, if not directly used, permitted
the use of the term "social work",
or even "registered social worker" in
his rank title in the course of his job,
and therefore might trigger section 35 of the Ordinance.
-
The Board is fully aware that aware that any use
of the terms "social work"
or "social worker" etc. will not constitute
an offence under the Ordinance if
such use is within sections 34(3) and (4) of the
Ordinance, i.e. using the
terms "social work" etc. to describe his
academic qualification or past working
experience (as envisaged by section 34(3) and (4)
of the Ordinance).
However, such exceptions will not apply to the situation
which a person actually
practices social work by engaging a social worker's
post.
-
The Board is also fully aware that it is not a statutory
requirement for person
to any person to register under the Ordinance provided
always that such person
does not describe himself or permit himself if to
be described in connection with
the terms "social work", "social
worker" etc.
Interpretation of the Judgment delivered by Mr.
Justice Stone
-
The Board appreciates that Mr. Justice Stone has
clarified that the
Ordinance dose impose a statutory requirement
for all social
workers to register. The Bored also notes that Mr.
Justice Stone has
clarified how an unregistered social worker could
be held liable of
a criminal offence under the Ordinance.:-
"...it is plain on a fair reading of the sequence
of correspondence
that the criminal aspect which was principally arousing
concern lay
not in failure to register per se but in the event
that social workers
in the relevant grades continued to use their rank
titles in the course
of their jobs absent such registration" (page
19)
-
It is under such circumstances that a social worker
who fails to register
or fails to renew his registration status whilst
practicing social work
and occupying social work post may trigger section
35 under the Ordinance.
|
20/12/99
高等法院為張文慧就註冊制度申請司法覆核已完成聆訊,及於本年十二月三日下達判詞。現將高等法院判詞原文照錄於此網頁,供各位參閱。
[ 請按此下載判詞原文 ]
|