|
News Update
13/12/2003
Election of Social Workers Registration Board Members
Result of Vote Counting
The
election of Members of the Social Workers Registration Board was conducted
in December 2003. A total of 3,062 ballots were received by 12:00 noon
on 13 December 2003. After the vote counting on the same day, the result
is as follows:
|
Name
of Candidate
|
No.
of Votes Received
|
|
Ma
Lai Chong
|
1,246
|
|
Chan
Wing Leung
|
434
|
|
Chui
Pong Hung
|
708
|
|
Leung
Ngai Mou Yin, Justina
|
1,146
|
|
Ngai
Kong Yiu
|
769
|
|
Mak
Hoi Wah
|
1,104
|
|
Wong
Keung Sang
|
1,226
|
|
Yuk
Tak Fun
|
817
|
|
Chui
Wing Tak, Ernest
|
687
|
|
Li
Shuet
|
851
|
|
Chiu
Lap Kee
|
920
|
|
So
Wai Kee
|
609
|
|
Yuen
Tsang Woon Ki, Angelina
|
1,104
|
|
Chan
Yee Fei
|
681
|
|
Tsui
Ming Sum
|
956
|
|
Man
Hung Yee, Joseph
|
304
|
|
Koo
Wing Hon
|
678
|
|
Law
Chi Kwong
|
1,442
|
|
Wong
Man Sing, Barry
|
452
|
|
Shum
Chung Fun
|
403
|
|
Ng
Chiu Yan
|
646
|
10/12/2003
Validation of Ballot Papers in the Election of Members
of the Social Workers Registration Board
The
Board Secretariat has received enquiries from RSWs on why they have
to fill in their personal particulars in completing the ballot paper
for the election of members of the Social Workers Registration Board.
To
help RSWs relieve their worries over this matter, I would like clarify
the validation process adopted by the Board in this election exercise.
First of all, the provision of personal particulars of voters in the
completed ballot paper is purely for validation purpose only. As ballot
papers are despatched to RSW voters by mail and completed ballot papers
are returned by RSW voters to the Board Secretariat either by mail or
in person, it is necessary to adopt measures to ensure that right ballot
paper received by the Board Secretariat is the right ballot paper that
the Board Secretariat has sent to the RSW voter concerned on 25 November
2003. For this purpose, when the ballot papers are printed, each ballot
paper is serial numbered. Each RSW voter has his / her own unique serial
numbered ballot paper.
Upon
receipt of the envelops containing the ballot papers, the envelops are
put into locked ballot boxes. The ballot boxes will be opened by two
observers at 2:00p.m. on 13 December 2003 and vote counting will begin
immediately. The envelops will be opened and the ballot paper will be
read by a computer scanner. The computer will check the serial number
of the ballot paper and the HKID ID No. or passport no. provided in
the ballot paper against the data base of RSW voters. A ballot paper
will be validated if and only if the personal particulars provided by
the voter and the serial number of the ballot paper match with data-base
of the RSW voters. If the two does not match, the ballot will not be
counted by the computer. The above arrangement is designed to prevent
against the casting of more than one vote by any voter and the casting
of votes by a person who is not a voter in this election.
During
the vote counting exercise, the computer will only generate the following
three reports, namely, (i) report on the total number of voters participating
in this election, (ii) report on the votes received by each candidate
and (iii) report on the top eight candidates who have received the highest
number of votes.
A
validation process in the above manner is necessary because in this
election exercise, votes are cast by RSW voters by returning of ballot
papers to the Board Secretariat by post.
SWRB
Webmail System
Dear
Registered Social Worker,
I
am pleased to inform you that the SWRB Webmail System is now ready
for use by our Registered Social Workers (“RSWs”). The purpose of
setting up the SWRB Webmail System is to enhance communication between
the Board and RSWs as well as communication among RSWs.
Please
follow the attached guidelines and logon the SWRB Webmail System (http://email.swrb.org.hk)
to activate your webmail account at your earliest convenience. The
Board will send the following messages to you via the email account:
messages
from the Board for general purpose;
publicity materials from tertiary institutes and agencies;
the Board’s publications; and
invitation letters on renewal of registration.
To
facilitate us to make arrangements on sending email copy and hard
copy of the above messages to you, please complete and return the
reply slip on your preference to receive email copy or hard copy of
the above messages to the Board Secretariat at your earliest convenience.
If we do not receive your reply slip, on top of email copy, we will
continue to send you hard copy of the above messages. You may change
your preference at any time if you wish to do so by making a written
request to us.
If
you need more information on the above, please feel free to contact
our Board Secretariat at 2591 1955.
Yours
sincerely,
Mrs.
Justina Leung
Acting Chairperson
Social Workers Registration Board
[
Click
here to download the initial guideline ]
13/9/2003
Notice
of Revised Fee Schedule
In accordance with subsection 38(3) of the Social Workers Registration
Ordinance (Chapter 505), the Social Workers Registration Board, following
consultation with the Secretary for Health, Welfare & Food, announces
the revised fee schedule as follows:
| Application
for Registration |
$700
|
| Renewal
of Registration |
$400
|
| Re-application
within 3 years after de-registration |
$600
|
| Re-application
more than 3 years after de-registration |
$700
|
For
enquiries, please call : 2591
1955
1/9/2003
The
audited accounts of the Registration Board for the period from 1 April
2002 to 31 March 2003 is set out below for information:
Please
click here to view the Audited Accounts
6/12/2002
Notice
This
is to announce that Mrs. Patricia Chu, the Representative of the Director
of Social Welfare to sit on the Social Workers Registration Board,
will retire from her post in the Department. She has commenced her
pre-retirement leave since 6 December 2002. With effect from the same
date, Mrs. Chu left the office of Chairperson of the Board. Pursuant
to Section 4(6) of the Social Workers Registration Ordinance, Mrs.
Justina Leung, the Deputy Chairperson, will act as Chairperson of
the Board until 15 January 2004. Mr. SIT Tung will succeed Mrs. Chu,
in the capacity of the representative of the Director of Social Welfare,
to be Member of the Board.
26/09/2002
The
Board launched an opinion poll in March 2002 to gauge RSWs' opinions
and intent on the Board’s proposed amendments to the Social Workers
Registration Ordinance. The result of the poll is emunerated as follows
for RSWs' easy information.
Please
click here to download the result of the poll
24/8/01
Statement
of the Advisory Committee
On
Social Work Training and Manpower Planning
On Continuing Professional Development of Social Workers
The
Advisory Committee on Social Work Training and Manpower Planning,
an advisory body on the education and training of social workers,
notes that in the newly released Guidelines on Code of Practice
for Registered Social Workers, the Social Workers Registration
Board (SWRB) recommends social workers to attend professional enhancement
activities of not less than 24 hours a year aiming at upgrading their
professional skills and knowledge. The committee believes that the
social work profession is a progressive profession that strives for
improvement and excellence. Like other professions that share the
mission of enhancing the well-being of the community, the social work
profession, in view of the rapid changes in Hong Kong, should be aware
of the need to refresh and consolidate the existing knowledge and
practice through training and should also constantly upgrade and advance
itself to better serve the community and facilitate positive social
development. Social workers, being professionally trained, should
always keep themselves abreast of the changes impacting on the community
and the profession, and explore new approaches in discharging their
competence to meeting the new and changing demands on, and the rising
expectation of the profession.
As
stipulated in the Reform Proposals for the Education System in Hong
Kong issued by the Education Commission in September 2000, Hong Kong
needs to develop into a society that values lifelong learning. Everyone
should have the attitude and ability for lifelong learning and a willingness
to advance further beyond the existing knowledge level, and to continuously
consolidate and upgrade their knowledge and ability. Continuing education
is therefore crucial for the social work profession in facing the
challenges ahead.
The
Committee considers that now is the opportune time to promote continuing
professional development among social workers, and strongly supports
the recommendation of the SWRB that social workers should attend professional
enhancement activities of not less than 24 hours a year.
11/08/2000
Policies
and Procedures for handling complaints against / opinions on Social
Workers Registration Board
To
strengthen the communication with Registered Social Workers (“RSWs”),
the Board has drawn up a set of procedures to deal with the complaints/opinions
lodged by the public/RSWs against/on the Board’s policies, practice
and operation. Please
click here for the details of the procedures. You may also download
the forms as appended from “Forms” of this homepage.
11/04/2000
Web
Resources on Social Work Programs
Please
be informed that WWW Resources for Social Workers is providing a list
of social work programs available round the world. You may visit website
www.nyu.edu/socialwork/wwwrsw
for details.
03/04/2000
|
Extracted
Replay to RSW's Enquiries
The
Board has recently received enquiries from RSWs seeking
clarification on the interpretation of section 35 of the Social
Workers
Registration Ordinance and the interpretation of the Judgement handed
down by Mr. Justice Stone on the judicial review sought by en ex-social
worker. After seeking legal advice, the Board has issued a reply
which
is extracted hereunder for general information:-
Interpretation
of the Ordinance
-
Under section 35 of the Ordinance,
"Any person who-
...
(h)
hot being a registered social worker...knowingly permits the
use of, or uses, in connection with his business or profession.
(i) the description "registered social worker" or
"註冊社會工作者"
(ii) the initials "R.S.W."
(iii) the description "social work" or
"社會工作" or "social work"
or 社會工作者 or "社工",
(iv) any initials or abbreviation of words intended to cause,
or which
may reasonably cause, any person to believe that the person
using
the initials or abbreviations, as the case may be, is on the
Register,
(i)
not being on the Register, advertises or represents himself
as a registered
social worker or knowingly permits himself to be so advertised
or represented;
...
commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine at
level 5..."
-
According to the afore quoted section of the Ordinance, a person
who is not
registered under the Ordinance but nevertheless describes himself
as a
"registered social worker", or "social worker",
or use the description of
"social work", or permits the use of these terms with
his rank title, is liable
to be prosecuted.
-
A non registered person practicing social work or occupying the
post of a social
worker would have, if not directly used, permitted the use of
the term "social work",
or even "registered social worker" in his rank title
in the course of his job,
and therefore might trigger section 35 of the Ordinance.
-
The Board is fully aware that aware that any use of the terms
"social work"
or "social worker" etc. will not constitute an offence
under the Ordinance if
such use is within sections 34(3) and (4) of the Ordinance, i.e.
using the
terms "social work" etc. to describe his academic qualification
or past working
experience (as envisaged by section 34(3) and (4) of the Ordinance).
However, such exceptions will not apply to the situation which
a person actually
practices social work by engaging a social worker's post.
-
The Board is also fully aware that it is not a statutory requirement
for person
to any person to register under the Ordinance provided always
that such person
does not describe himself or permit himself if to be described
in connection with
the terms "social work", "social worker" etc.
Interpretation of the Judgment delivered by Mr. Justice Stone
-
The Board appreciates that Mr. Justice Stone has clarified that
the
Ordinance dose not impose a statutory requirement for all social
workers to register. The Bored also notes that Mr. Justice Stone
has
clarified how an unregistered social worker could be held liable
of
a criminal offence under the Ordinance.:-
"...it is plain on a fair reading of the sequence of correspondence
that the criminal aspect which was principally arousing concern
lay
not in failure to register per se but in the event that social
workers
in the relevant grades continued to use their rank titles in the
course
of their jobs absent such registration" (page 19)
-
It is under such circumstances that a social worker who fails
to register
or fails to renew his registration status whilst practicing social
work
and occupying social work post may trigger section 35 under the
Ordinance.
|
20/12/99
On
3 December 1999 the Court has handed down its judgement on the judicial
review sought by Miss Cheung Man-wai, Florence. The Court's judgement
is posted on the Homepage for your information.
[ Please
click here to download the court judgment ]
|